1 day ago
An ongoing dock permitting process in Clearwater has raised questions among residents about the effectiveness of state laws designed to protect the environment.
CLEARWATER, Fla. — A controversial dock project in a narrow Clearwater estuary is moving forward despite years of opposition from residents and environmental advocates who warn it could threaten manatees and other wildlife.
Neighbors opposing the proposal are puzzled by recent documents obtained by 10 Tampa Bay News, which reveal that the developer behind the project made a $24,300 donation to fulfill a state permitting requirement. Critics argue this payment allowed the project to bypass environmental protections intended for Florida’s aquatic preserves.
The proposal from Valor Capital involves adding nine private docks along Stevenson Creek for residents of the Serena by the Sea apartment complex. Stevenson Creek is part of an aquatic preserve, an area designated by the state for enhanced environmental protection.
For residents like Sherry Day, who has lived near the creek for more than a decade, the fight to stop the docks has become personal.
Day often launches her kayak from the creek and describes the quiet waterway as home to manatees, dolphins, and other wildlife that have returned after years of restoration efforts.
“It’s a wonderful connection with nature,” Day said. “We’ve estimated there’s been about $100 million in taxpayer money spent to restore it.”
Day and other members of the Stevenson Creek Advocacy Group worry that increased boat traffic could harm manatees that rely on the shallow estuary for fresh water.
“There’s not enough room for motorboats and manatees,” said Michael Foley, another member of the advocacy group. “Manatees have already been killed. We’ve documented six deaths in the Stevenson Creek estuary.”
However, state law permits agencies to accept monetary donations as mitigation for environmental impacts.
Records show Valor Capital donated $24,300 to the Aquatic Preserve Society, a nonprofit affiliated with the state’s aquatic preserve program. In a letter obtained by 10 Tampa Bay, the organization confirmed the payment and stated it would satisfy the project’s public interest requirement.
Critics argue this arrangement effectively allows developers to pay their way past certain environmental safeguards.
“We write letters, we attend meetings, we pay our taxes, and then these loopholes seem to be very strong in the developer’s favor,” Day said.
Records indicate this is not an isolated case. A similar situation occurred in 2024 in Lemon Bay near Englewood, where a developer contributed $30,000 to meet a public interest requirement for a commercial docking facility.
Advocates fear the Stevenson Creek project could set a precedent.
“This isn’t just one dock,” Foley said. “It's going to set a precedent that could turn the restored estuary into a marina.”
10 Tampa Bay News requested an interview with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection about the permitting process and donation policy, but the department declined all requests.
In a written statement, Valor Capital said the dock design complies with environmental regulations.
"The residential docks added by Valor along Stevenson Creek are in line with the surrounding docks for current homeowners,” the statement said. “The application was reviewed and approved by the City of Clearwater, Pinellas County Water & Navigation, FDEP and SWFWMD. The dock configuration is designed to have no impact on the adjacent oyster beds along the waterfrontage and is not located in an area that has been designated by any City, County, State or Federal agency as being environmentally significant. Even so, Valor is happy to support the state fund and is committed to continuing to be good stewards of the environment.”
The project has already received approval from city, state, and county authorities. It is still awaiting a decision from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the final step before construction can begin.
Meanwhile, Day and her neighbors hope the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers will reconsider before granting the permit—a decision they believe will affect more than just their community.
“I think we as a community need to look at our laws and speak out,” she said. “Stop the lobbyists being the powerful people that run our state. Bring it back to the people.”
